Finally: a common sense perspective

Before I comment, I want to present this article from Downsize DC in its entirety:



D o w n s i z e r - D i s p a t c h


Jim Babka will be speaking in Connecticut this weekend. Details below the signature.
Quote of the Day:"The government broke it. I don't trust them to fix it."

-- Senator Jim DeMint, Republican, South Carolina


Subject: Downsize DC commits suicide


We've heard the Treasury Secretary and the Federal Reserve Chairman make their case for a $700 billion bailout of the financial markets. We're not persuaded. Quite the contrary. We reject their predictions of dire consequences if their plan doesn't pass. We're so convinced of this that we're willing to stake our continued existence on it.


If the economy goes into a deep slump because they didn't pass their bailout plan then charitable contributions will be among the first things cut from family budgets. If we're wrong then we'll be among the many institutions to fail. But we don't believe we're wrong. And we don't believe we'll fail.


In 2003 dire warnings about "weapons of mass destruction" were used to justify an unnecessary war in Iraq. We bucked the tide of public hysteria and dared to claim that there were NO "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq.


We were right, and popular opinion, driven by political fear mongering, was wrong. Now we're being told that our economy is threatened by "financial weapons of mass destruction," and we'll once again buck the hysterical trend by predicting that . . .


There are no "financial weapons of mass destruction" threatening our economy -- except for the $700 billion bailout plan.


We don't believe that mortgage defaults on a mere 3 million homes have the power to halt the mighty American economic engine. It's really that simple.


Many wild claims are being made. Yesterday, on CNBC, Jim Cramer predicted a Great Depression II if the bailout plan isn't passed. Cramer is even willing to let the Democrats cap CEO pay and take ownership positions in troubled firms (socialism), if that's what it takes to pass the bailout plan. Cramer, despite his great intelligence and personal charm, is madly, hysterically, wrong.


In the Great Depression 40% of homes went into foreclosure.
Today the foreclosure rate is only 6%, and the trend is toward fewer foreclosures rather than more.


We're far closer to the end of this problem than we are to the beginning.


Of course, the fear mongers will claim that we had a 40% foreclosure rate in the Great Depression precisely because the government didn't intervene soon enough, and that current foreclosure rates will spiral out of control if the bailout bill isn't passed. This reading of history gets the true story of the Great Depression exactly backwards . . .


The myth is that President Hoover did nothing after the stock market burst in 1929. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, Hoover actually began the kinds of interventions that are commonly associated with FDR. Roosevelt was merely copying, and dramatically expanding on what Hoover had already done, not setting a new course. And look at what the results were . . . a Great Depression that lasted for 12 long years!


Hoover and Roosevelt both tried to stop market prices from falling, which is exactly what the current proposal aims to do. But the result in the late 20s and early 30s was that the market never cleared, and so the Depression went on and on and on.


We could have the same thing again today if we allow the government to once again intervene in natural market processes.


The fact is that the politicians, the bureaucrats, and various hysteria mongers, are misleading us. They tell us that the market is frozen, but the fact is that commercial loans are at an all-time high, and even real estate loans ARE HIGHER THAN THEY WERE LAST YEAR! The fact is that . . .


The current "crisis" is mainly centered among the highly leveraged investment banks on Wall Street, but even there the market is far from frozen. Merrill Lynch was able to sell its bad assets and was then bought by Bank of America (which had earlier bought CountryWide).


Does this look like a frozen market to you? It doesn't to us.


And would it really matter if the markets were "frozen?" Inactive markets simply mean that buyers and sellers of assets have a disagreement about what those assets are worth. We must not allow the politicians and the bureaucrats to substitute their judgement for the judgements of buyers and sellers who are, after all, SPENDING THEIR OWN MONEY, whereas the politicians and bureaucrats are asking to spend YOUR MONEY!


We've taken the time, and shown the courtesy, of hearing our "leaders" speak, and having done so, WE REJECT THEIR CLAIMS! THEIR MUST BE NO BAILOUT, OF ANY KIND!


Please be clear about what we're NOT saying. We're NOT saying that things are rosy, or even all that good. As we explained Monday, we're feeling the effects of a FED-generated bubble pop. We are very simply saying that a bailout is wrong-headed and unnecessary, and could even make things worse.


If you agree with us, please tell your elected representatives to OPPOSE ALL BAILOUTS! You can use our generic campaign for cutting federal spending to send your message. Use your personal comments to reject the bailout and to make any of the points we've made in this message, or additional arguments of your own.

You can send your message using our Educate the Powerful System.


But don't stop there. Please take the following additional steps . . .


* Call your Representative and your two Senators after you've sent your message* Pass this Dispatch to others -- SOUND THE ALARM AND SPREAD THE WORD* Register for a Digg account, and then Digg this message on our blog.


Finally, we've staked our existence on our principals and our best judgement. We expect to thrive, not die. But we are struggling in this economy too. Many DC Downsizers have had to cut their pledges because of the current downturn. Some have lost their jobs. We really need those of you who are still doing well to come to our aid. We especially need new monthly pledges to replace $400 a month we've lost so far this Summer.

You can make a contribution here.


Thank you for being a part of the growing Downsize DC army!


Jim Babka & Perry WillisPresident & Communications DirectorDownsizeDC.org, Inc.


P.S. This morning, I was on Brad Davis' show on WDRC-AM to talk about the first annual, "Connecticut Liberty Forum," to be held September 27-28, 2008. I'll be back on Brad's show on Saturday morning (9/27), just hours before I speak about "Making Congress Accountable to the Constitution." Also appearing at this Bristol, CT event, will be . . .


* Michael Cristofaro, Plaintiff in the New London, CT eminent domain case, will talk about that case, after he and Susette Kelo are presented with the very first Connecticut Freedom Fighter Award.


* Robert Levy, Senior fellow in Constitutional Studies, CATO Institute. His topic: “Is the Supreme Court Eroding Our Liberty?” Mr. Levy will stick around to sign copies of his new book, “The Dirty Dozen – How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom”


* Also speaking... DC Downsizer Alan Schaeffer, Alliance for the Separation of School & State; DC Downsizer Dr. Robban Sica, Vice President of CT Health Freedom Coalition; DC Downsizer and Attorney Deborah Stevenson, Executive Director of National Home Education Legal Defense; Bob Schulz, We the People Foundation; Dr. Katherine Albrecht, co-author of "Spychips," and more.


I want to encourage you to come to this event -- to meet me and hear the other speakers. Please use the code "Downsize DC" to get a discount when you register in advance. Complete details can be found at http://nheld.com/CTLibertyForum.htm.


And if you're coming to Bristol, CT, please let me know by hitting Reply to this message TODAY. My wife Sue and I like to make time to meet with DC Downsizers when we're traveling. We will be in touch.


D o w n s i z e r - D i s p a t c his the official email list of DownsizeDC.org, Inc. & Downsize DC Foundation
CONTRIBUTE to the Electronic Lobbyist project
http://www.downsizedc.org/ is sponsored by DownsizeDC.org, Inc. -- a non-profit educational organization promoting the ideas of individual liberty, personal responsibility, free markets, and small government.


You are encouraged to forward this message to friends and business associates, and permission is hereby granted to reproduce any items herein as long as attribution is provided for articles and the subscription instructions above are included.







When I received this email today, I thought, "Wow. Finally, a common sense perspective on this government bailout issue." I have heard so much gloom and doom on the news lately that it is difficult to delve through all the bullshit and get to something more level-headed. I hear commentators saying that we are headed for a second Great Depression and then I hear Obama on TV saying that a bad economy is what happens when the markets are too free to do as they will and therefore, we need more government regulation in order to prevent such a thing. Nope, I don't fucking think so! Too damn much government is the problem, not the solution. And using money that I worked hard for and then got bent over and gave to the government to bail out companies that screwed themselves over is not fair. Guess what: businesses fail sometimes. THAT'S BUSINESS. If a company is full of idiots and/or frauds and/or is just plain mismanaged and it fails, that is not a sign of the Apocalypse. For Christ's sakes, businesses failing is sometimes a means of the public being able to voice an opinion of "you are not wanted." I am not saying that is necessarily what has happened with the companies that are presently in the news; I am merely making a point that not patronizing a business is a fundamental way a consumer can voice disapproval. If I have a bad meal at a place and choose not to go back and later, that business fails because other people had crappy meals and decided not to go back either, should the government bail the restaurant out and allow them to continue dishing out shit? While using your money to fund it? Think about it.

Lest you think by my jab at Obama that I am a fan of McCain, guess again. I'm not voting for either one of those men. I really say that Larry Elder got it right when he said there's a dime's worth of difference between Democrats and Republicans. For all their arguing, they both seem to want the government to get bigger and bigger. Rewind it back to the famous words of Barry Goldwater: Any government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take it all away. What you may not realize is that government spending has gone through the fucking roof-- under the current Bush administration. That doesn't sound like they want smaller government to me. If you compare GWB's spending to, say, both of Reagan's terms combined or even both of Bill Clinton's terms combined, you will find that Bush has spent MORE. I did not vote for Bush in either election and I am damn proud to say that. I knew he was bad news back in 2000 and everyone should have fucking known in 2004. Urrrrgh. Anyway, if you need evidence of my point about spending, go to http://www.independent.org/images/article_images/charts/040624_spending.gif. And bear in mind, this graph was created in 2004. Imagine how much more staggering his spending is today.

And while you're in the mood to read, check out this gem from the lips of Sarah Palin: We could be headed for a second Great Depression. Damn. Isn't that what the Democrats are saying? See what Larry Elder means about a dime's worth of difference . . .

http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/sep/24/palin-another-great-depression-could-be-store/


I will close with this thought from Jason Pye's blog on Bob Barr's statement on the "bailout from Hell":

Milton Friedman once said that the American economy is “more than half socialist.” You can’t help but believe that we’ve made that transition with this takeover and the effect it will have on taxpayers.



Back in the USSR. You don't know how *lucky* you are, boy . . .